How have groups of scholars cited the Qur'an to support their Research Paper

How have groups of scholars cited the Quran to support their different stances on prophetic immunity from sin - Research Paper ExampleControversies arise when the revelations of God (the spring that is incomprehensible to mind) argon interpreted and discussed by the mind-level scholars. This is true of scholars of any religion and Islam is no exception. No scholar can reach the divine heights of prophets and as such common agreement for their different stances is impossibility. The followers of Islam have their inspiration and guidance from twin sources. The norms and assumptions that have characterized belief and action in Islam have their sign inspiration in two foundational sources. One is scriptural, embodying the message revealed by God to the Prophet Muhammad and recorded in the Quran. The second is the exemplification of that message in the comprehend model pattern of the Prophets actions, sayings and norms, collectively called the sunna. (Nanji, n.p.)) For Muslims Quran is the ultimate scripture, its revelations are inviolable it contains direct communication from God. The contents of Quran are not debatable as such there is no question of difference interpretations as for those revelations. Sunna comes next in the order of preference in the sense it contains historical, but divinely inspired contents as guided by Prophet Muhammad, whom the Muslims believe that he is the last in the series of messengers from God.(Nanji, n, p.) He is the final religious sureness for the Muslims. The late Fazlur Rahman, noted University of Chicago scholar of Islamic thought and modernist Muslim thinker, argued that in its initial phase Islam was moved by a deep perspicacious and moral concern for reforming society and that this moral intentionality was conceived in ways that encouraged a deep commitment to reasoning and rational discourse.(Nanji, n.p.) Quran is the revelation of God and it cannot be compared or estimated with the measuring scale of reasoning. Here is the origin of conflict between the scholars. Because most of the scholars speak and write from the mind-level and they are not connected to the divine source. When revelations are weighed in the scale of human reason, the results are not going to be divine. Rational understanding and divine understanding are poles apart. Human beings may rationalise about their connectivity, which is not there in real terms. The relationship between the Quran and the life of the Prophet, as a model of behavior, was also elaborated to create a legal framework within which values and obligations could be determined.(Nanji, n.p.) But when the scholars intervene, no two scholars have ever given identical opinions on any combative issue. Every scholar cites Quran but interprets its revelation in the light of the reasoning that one visualizes. Different stances of the scholars regarding prophetic sins need to be understood in this context. prefigurative immunity from sin Truth needs to be followed imp licitly when it has been accepted as truth. Truth is complete and there is nothing like partial truth. When the implementing government activity of truth, the Prophets especially chosen for the assignment, there is no question of deviation from the path of truth. They are expected to dutifully deliver truth to humankind. God has chosen them with a purpose and he has the detailed backgrounder information about the ones he has chosen. However, Jonah (pbuh), for instance, deliberately abandoned his divinely ordained